Jarod Wilson wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:34:49 -0500 >> Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Can you - or someone - comment on whether you'd trust it with your >>> working copy of something important? >> All my development happens on Fedora, I push the code up to hosted.fp.o >> periodically. The only real thing stopping me from having more on >> Fedora is the timeline. There are servers that I just don't want to >> touch, save for the few updates that apply to that install set, for >> years, and for that I have RHEL, the Long Term Fedora. Everything else >> is Fedora. > > My "day job" is RHEL kernel stuff. And yet, my personal web and mail > server, home file server, home workstation, office workstation and > laptop all run Fedora (and F7 at the oldest now). I most definitely > trust Fedora with my working copy of something important -- like the > PITA backport patches I'm working on for the RHEL kernel... ;) Oh, just saw Jesse's reply and read further up the thread... The "it" was the new firewire stack, not Fedora, right? FWIW, I do have a few firewire hard drives and a firewire dvd burner that all work just fine with the new stack, haven't had any issues whatsoever. (anything firewire that touches libavc1394, libraw1394 or libiec61883 is another issue though...) -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
