At 12:39 PM +0200 8/6/07, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >Tony Nelson wrote: >> Yes, the checks passed. (They don't check referential integrity, the data >> relationships between tables. They just check that each table is in proper >> format.) >> >> It's good to know the database is not hosed when RPM is being weird. I've >> seen it limp along for quite a while, getting weirder and weirder. > >Yes, that's exactly why I posted about the problem on this mailinglist. >Right now it only seems to be a minor annoyance but I fear that it might >lead to bigger problems down the road. Given that other users have reported >similar problems on this list with other packages in the last couple of >days and that according to >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250604 this problem >doesn't seem to be confined to rawhide I think this looks like a bug in >rpm. While I cannot say how serious this bug really is I tend to get a >little nervous when it comes to creeping integrity problems of databases >(rpm's or otherwise). Could this be a result of the latest rpm version >update (which had a rather long changelog)? Yes, certainly, that's programming for you. However, I'm not using that version so I can't be of more help (too darn busy to install F7 -- may skip to F8, sigh). Now that the simple stupid question is settled, it's time for me to be quiet and let this problem go back to the experts. -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
