On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 17:46 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 02:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Brian Pepple wrote: > > > > > * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureCodecBuddy - FESCo > > > approved this proposal. > > > > > > > I wish FESCo hadn't approved this. There is a lot of things being > > discussed in FAB list about this and Max Spevack was going to get legal > > to look into the questions raised there. From my understanding the > > package under review currently is not how we want this feature to work. > > If you want this to work differently, better start working on an > alternative. Also look at the updated details on the feature page, > which take up some of the points raised in the fab discussion. Hopefully the developers are watching/involved in the discussions. We've also got John Poelstra watching both sides. These folks need to make sure details and changes don't fall between the cracks and get lost/behind schedule. Bottom line is, the feature description (and resulting code) is going to have to (re)conform to what Fedora's legal friends tell us is best. Right? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.fedorapeople.org | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
