Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 02:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Brian Pepple wrote:
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureCodecBuddy - FESCo
approved this proposal.
I wish FESCo hadn't approved this. There is a lot of things being
discussed in FAB list about this and Max Spevack was going to get legal
to look into the questions raised there. From my understanding the
package under review currently is not how we want this feature to work.
If you want this to work differently, better start working on an
alternative.
It is not code. Questions need to be answered from Red Hat Legal. There
is no point in working on a alternative that we cannot include otherwise.
Also look at the updated details on the feature page,
which take up some of the points raised in the fab discussion.
Yes. I have seen that. Just pointing directly to Fluendo is not really a
acceptable solution. That has been made clearly already. See the FAB
list discussions for details.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
