On Friday 03 August 2007, Jesse Keating wrote: > > He then reviewed the two current kmods: I'm guessing davej talks about em8300 in the quoted part below: > <davej> this doesn't look like it'd need huge amounts of work to get > into an upstreamable state > > <davej> it'd need to lose crap like devfs > support though > > <davej> and all the #ifdef KERNEL_VERSION < 2.5.x junk > > > <davej> but the key blocker is, is someone going to do the work to get > it into that state? > > <jwb> davej, ok... so given that if the maintainer > was willing to work on that would you let them carry it in the main > kernel as a patch? > > <davej> jwb: if someone was working on it, sure. There's some related discussion going on in the em8300-devel mailing list, here's a link to a message I just posted: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=200708050125.29726.ville.skytta%40iki.fi&forum_name=dxr3-devel -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
