On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:43:33 +0100 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In updates, such things are actually much less likely to break, except > when we rebase to a newer kernel -- and if you've kept your driver > working in rawhide then it should work fine when we rebase the release > to the newer kernel anyway. Even if not, we tend to be quite > conservative about releasing new kernels anyway -- they end up in > updates-testing for some time, and that gives you time to get it > working. The urgent security fixes are usually relatively small and > unlikely to break drivers. > > It's not something that scales hugely, but we don't _want_ it to. We > should be sticking close to upstream, and not shipping drivers which > aren't getting merged. Yeah that sounds reasonable. Any chance we could get a peep from Davej and Cebbert on this? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
