On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:48:57 +0200 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> wrote: > I must say I like this approach, it avoids the whole problem of > having to rebuild kmods all the time and of wether to delay kernel > security updates until all kmods are fixetd etc. I do think however > that this might cause some pain for Dave Jones, whose job already is > hard. Maybe we should ask him what he thinks about this? Well, if the module doesn't build fine with an update, most likely what's going to happen is the module gets disabled, which could result in even more frequent kernel updates just for getting a single module to build again. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
