Re: .noarch <-> .i386/.x86_64/.ppc change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: .noarch <-> .i386/.x86_64/.ppc change
From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: Peter Gordon's message of Thursday, 26 July 2007 02:24:06 -0700 <1185441846.14828.15.camel@tuxhugs>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

I believe it's the inverse transition that was a real problem in the past.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Re: .noarch <-> .i386/.x86_64/.ppc change
  - From: Peter Gordon

Prev by Date: Re: .noarch <-> .i386/.x86_64/.ppc change
Next by Date: Re: unfiled merge reviews
Previous by thread: Re: .noarch <-> .i386/.x86_64/.ppc change
Next by thread: GDM BUG : Do a User switching without correct password
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux