Douglas McClendon wrote:
Richard Hally wrote:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Richard Hughes (hughsient@xxxxxxxxx) said:
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 00:55 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Argh. So why _are_ we doing our own special rules instead
of using the upstream ones ? This isn't the only time I've
run into something like this with udev.
Our udev is about 100x times slower than upstream...
I find it hard to believe it's 100x slower. I've done testing
of it with most of the not-needed-for-booting rules commented out -
execution time only dropped from ~5 to ~3.5 seconds.
This may be something unrelated (qemu bug?), but I feel I should
mention-
When I boot livecds that I've spun with livecd-creator in qemu, the
udev step takes a painfully long time to complete, and even just
hangs a fair percentage of the time.
Has anyone else noticed anything like this? At some point I'll do a
little more research and file a proper bug.
-dmc
yes, on my rawhide box ( a P4 3.2Ghz with H/T) when booting I get to
the "starting udev:" and it sits there for 2:44 (that is 2 minutes and
44 seconds)!
then continues booting.
I'm glad I'm not the only one. The main reason, until this thread, that
I pegged it for a qemu bug was that I can hit the hang/2:44 scenario,
ctrl-c, and restart with the exact same commandline*, and then it will
take a slow, but reasonable (~15-30s) time to complete.
I've had this problem (an extremely long wait for things like udev to
start) when the configs are referencing users (or groups) that do not
exist in /etc/passwd, and an ldap-server is defined in /etc/ldap.conf
and that server is unavailable.
Just a thought...
--
_,--', _._.--._____
.--.--';_'-.', ";_ _.,-' Ola Thoresen
.'--'. _.' {`'-;_ .-.>.'
'-:_ ) / `' '=. It is easier to fix Unix
) > {_/, /~) than to live with Windows
|/ `^ .'
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list