Re: Fwd: Re: film at 11: kernel update breaks udev.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham wrote:
Richard Hughes (hughsient@xxxxxxxxx) said:
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 00:55 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Argh.  So why _are_ we doing our own special rules instead
of using the upstream ones ?  This isn't the only time I've
run into something like this with udev.
Our udev is about 100x times slower than upstream...

I find it hard to believe it's 100x slower. I've done testing
of it with most of the not-needed-for-booting rules commented out -
execution time only dropped from ~5 to ~3.5 seconds.

This may be something unrelated (qemu bug?), but I feel I should mention-

When I boot livecds that I've spun with livecd-creator in qemu, the udev step takes a painfully long time to complete, and even just hangs a fair percentage of the time.

Has anyone else noticed anything like this? At some point I'll do a little more research and file a proper bug.

-dmc

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux