Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tuesday 03 July 2007 14:41:00 Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> The rsyslog package has been approved and is ready to enter the >> collection. I just thought I would ask if anyone has any issues or >> concerns with switching to rsyslog for default system logger in f8? >> >> See: >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureRsyslog >> and >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243831 >> >> Would it be helpfull to get it pushed out for f7/devel without any >> Obsoletes first so folks can test it? Or should we just replace >> sysklogd in devel right off? > > Instead of looking at this as a 'new default logger', perhaps it would be > better to look at this as a 'rsyslogd is obsoleting sysklogd'. Think of it > purely within the scope of one package is replacing the other, due to things > like sysklogd being dead upstream. In that context, we can do the replacement > now and be happy. > > It's a different subject as to if we want to "switch the default logger" or > perhaps "switch to different logging options by default", and that could use > some discussion with various folks. However that is an aside to the pure > technical thing of rsyslogd is replacing sysklogd. Jesse, does it mean that init,conf,logrot. and sysconf file should be named same? > > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
