Re: init script bugs and changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 17:38 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Harald, I appreciate your dillagence in filing all these bugs, however I think 
> > a change like this needs to go through the Fedora Packaging Committee.  
> > You're asking folks to change content in init scripts when there hasn't been 
> > much / any discussion on the topic.  If we're going to make this policy going 
> > forward, it really needs to be in the packaging guidelines, and approved by 
> > FESCo.
> > 
> > 
> 
> So where does that leave the receivers of said bugs, I assume we should wait 
> until this has been discussed? Leave the bugs open in the mean time?

I don't think making init scripts lsb compliant has to wait until some
higher body gives you a thumbs up. Not that it will help much in terms
of boot speed, but the lsb compliance itself is not something that is
controversial or anything, so you could just do it and forget about the
bug...

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux