On 05.07.2007 09:49, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > . If the Fedora >> maintainer later wants to participate in EPEL in general and maintain >> this package, then the EPEL maintainer of the package should hand >> primary per release maintainership back to the Fedora maintainer (and >> become comaintainer, if interested). > This in essence would mean that the Fedora maintainer can essentally > take over the EPEL branch even if there are long term contributors who > have taken a good interest and contribute well to EPEL. Why is that > desirable? It's not. There was a "within some weeks want to participate in EPEL" in one of the drafts, but seems I deleted it myself accidentally. I'll bring that up in a EPEL SIG meeting soon, but for now this will become policy. CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
