Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: . If the Fedora
maintainer later wants to participate in EPEL in general and maintain this package, then the EPEL maintainer of the package should hand primary per release maintainership back to the Fedora maintainer (and become comaintainer, if interested).
This in essence would mean that the Fedora maintainer can essentally take over the EPEL branch even if there are long term contributors who have taken a good interest and contribute well to EPEL. Why is that desirable?
Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
