>Instead of looking at this as a 'new default logger', perhaps it would be
>better to look at this as a 'rsyslogd is obsoleting sysklogd'.
Exactly. We don't need to maintain a new and deprecated syslogger.
> Think of it purely within the scope of one package is replacing the other, due
> to things like sysklogd being dead upstream. In that context, we can do the
> replacement now and be happy.
I think we would like to make the switch as soon as possible to maximize the
amount of testing it will get before everyone depends on it. We are losing
testing everyday that goes by.
-Steve
____________________________________________________________________________________
Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
