On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:21:06AM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 19:07 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:14:20AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > I also wonder what the 2.1% i386 are. These can't be true i386, or if > > > they are they can't be 30x as many as i586. > > > > I'd been wondering if those are qemu/vmware/xen or something similar ? > > Generally those will report what the host CPU really is, as they're > "virtualized" but they're still running on the host CPU. Though qemu's > software mode may be different. I always run with kqemu, and Windows XP > detects the Athlon 64 I'm running on. Well, smolt does keep the database and by correlating vendor and CPU one would get a finer grained picture of the i386 systems. At least VMware offers a BIOS vendor string pointing to itself. But since there are ~8% VMware system but only ~2% i386 systems, at least 3/4 of the VMware systems cannot report i386. BTW also quite a high value, VMware guests at 8%? Can we detect xen/qemu guests to have stats on physical vs virtual hosts? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpHIpyuJL9ti.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
