Re: 586 kernels.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:10:35 -0400, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yeah. The alternative is that I un-kill 586, and we continue shipping
> that forever.  (Or we just tell those 38 586 users to go make their
> own spin).

I'm thinking about getting a new box anyway (it's an old not-quite-C3
with some odd Biblean-sounding codename, chugging along at 800MHz).
With less than 40 users, it's just not worth it. I'm surprised though,
I thought VIA was more popular than that.

-- Pete

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux