On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 08:25 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 05:02:41AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Axel Thimm wrote: > >> > >>> Whether it's "incorrectly" or not is up to the eye of the beholder, > >>> and FWIW README.distribution is serving neither side of the > >>> grammar. Or is this package really going to be used in a > >>> "distribution"? I'm quite sure it will be. > >> Distribution is just a off hand suggestion. Feel free to come up with a > >> better name like others have suggested. > > > > How about README.Fedora? +1 > Axel, Don't waste everyone's time. Rahul, you are wasting our time, by having made an issue from a non-issue. Users aren't as dumb as you seem to think. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
