Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:24:41PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 10:30 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
In the case of README files there is genuine advantages to have generic
names. You have less changes to take care off when you branch off to
RHEL, EPEL or OLPC. Maybe other distributions can be encouraged to use
README.distribution too.
That would be unfortunate. README.suse != README.fedora !=
README.ubuntu....
Exactly. If the contents are equal then by definition it would not be
suited for README.<distro>.
Isn't EPEL Fedora anymore? Why the need to banish README.Fedora?
EPEL isn't targeted for Fedora. I did refer to the discussion. Think
about this from the end user perspective rather than from the project
perspective.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
