On Thursday 28 June 2007 22:54:45 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > A recent discussion in EPEL about whether README.Fedora would be > confusing to EPEL users has brought into forefront what I consider a > good packaging guideline for Fedora to follow which is to avoid using > the "Fedora" name as much as possible in package names and files with > exceptions like "Fedora directory server" and recommend using generic > names wherever possible. > > This would certainly help in being a better upstream for distribution > and other efforts that are based on Fedora including RHEL, EPEL or OLPC. > > In this specific instance I believe the guidelines should be mandating > README.distribution instead. > > Refer to > https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-June/msg00064.html > for the discussion. > > Rahul At what point does this become silly though? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpS4jy9Mt11W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
