On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 01:51:48PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 11:57:39AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > >>>post F7 upgrade (meaning I didn't check beforehand) uname -m and arch > >>>report i686. Smolt also sees this as an i686 - in fact the complete > >>>profile is at > >>> > >>Whats the right way to determine the arch of the box? > >> > > > >uname -m > > > >However for the "gcc 686" as opposed to "Intel/AMD 686" you must also check > >that cmov is available. Basically smolt is right gcc is wrong 8) > > > > I guess I could look at it another way, what info can I grab so its > useful to the developers to make decisions about this stuff :) Isn't all of /proc/cpuinfo transmitted? Maybe a finer grained stats on cpu family/model/flags under the "CPU" tag? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpfJYU7nMPA5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
