On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:32:47 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: >> spec:Requires/BuildRequires...) Therefore I can't see that ebuilds are >> looser integrated. > > It isn't the ebuilds per se that are less integrated, but the gentoo > packaging. Perhaps my last post in the topic! :) to clarify: gentoo: loose integration greater quantity of packages fedora: tight integration lesser quantity of packages However, if it's about the same quantity of labor to create an e-build as to create an RPM, I'm not sure *why* the quantity of ebuilds is greater... So, isn't some form of, perhaps, tightly integrated build-from source type packaging, the best of both worlds? (binaries for GNOME, and so forth, at request a la sabayon.) -Thufir -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
