Re: portage vs yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:09:45 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:

> "Integration" isn't about speed.  It's about ensuring that the software
> works together, that it has been built with the right options to enable
> the desired features, that the features /work/ as expected, etc...
> 
> It's the kind of work we do to work towards a single dictionary system
> instead of one for each app (still working on this...)
> 
> It's the kind of work we do to try and make each desktop application use
> the same file selection tools, themes, etc...

thanks for clarifying.  This is getting close to naysaying, but I'd 
prefer more packages, easier to upgrade from fedora N to N+1, than 
integration.  My personal preference.

Going back to expediency, ebuild ease of creation versus rpm ease of 
creation:  e-builds are easier due to the looser integration?  What are 
other factors, please?



thanks,

Thufir

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux