Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Christopher Aillon wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
This is not a big enough change to warrant that IMO though. It
won't be any more newsworthy than any other firefox release. It
will be done sooner rather than later. Probably by next week,
although having to send my status updates on a tiny project like
this isn't helping me get it done faster.
This goes to the heart of the problem. You don't consider the changes
important but it is. Firefox related changes are BIG news.
Please stop misinterpreting things. I never said it was not
important. I am saying that it is not any more important than going
from 2.0.0.0 to 2.0.0.4. It will require an equivalent amount of
work: this is essentially just a version upgrade.
This is amply different from being merely a version upgrade. That should
be evident by the amount of discussions within Fedora and in Mozilla.
People will always find something to complain about
but I'm glad that I was at least able to help fulfill your wiki page
writing desires.
There will be always people critical of our work but that in many cases
helps us understand the things we need to change. No thanks to you for
demotivating sarcasm on efforts that were taken in part from helping you
avoid answering repetitive questions but let me clarify that I have no
inherent desires to write wiki pages.
So fine. You win. Please put up a wiki page that says that XULRunner
will be included in the next week or so.
It was never about me winning. It was about having a planned and
transparent feature list.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/XULRunner
This has been renamed to FeatureXULRunner for consistency.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
