On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:14:16 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thursday 28 June 2007 13:04:09 Michael Schwendt wrote: > > You seem to be confused about why your "%ifnarch" usage in the spec > > doesn't work. It is because you build "noarch", where the arch doesn't > > matter. It is an arch-independent build. Unless the compose tool is > > broken, it would still ship the noarch build for ppc/ppc64. > > > > <snip> > > > > > This is something that has been a topic before. A "noarch" package > > which depends on arch-specific packages, which are not available for > > all arches, cannot really be noarch or should use ExcludeArch properly > > (which is another ugly hack). > > Just to clarify, the (F7+ at least, not sure about Extras) compose tools do > honor Exclude/ExclusiveArch on noarch packages. Extras supports ExcludeArch for noarch src.rpms, too, but that's not the topic here. Re-read the quote. The spec does BuildArch: noarch ppc ppc64 without ExcludeArch. That would publish the noarch build for ppc/ppc64, too, wouldn't it? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
