Re: rpms/revisor/F-7 revisor.spec,1.7,1.8 sources,1.8,1.9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 28 June 2007 13:04:09 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> You seem to be confused about why your "%ifnarch" usage in the spec
> doesn't work. It is because you build "noarch", where the arch doesn't
> matter. It is an arch-independent build. Unless the compose tool is
> broken, it would still ship the noarch build for ppc/ppc64.
>

<snip>

>
> This is something that has been a topic before. A "noarch" package
> which depends on arch-specific packages, which are not available for
> all arches, cannot really be noarch or should use ExcludeArch properly
> (which is another ugly hack).

Just to clarify, the (F7+ at least, not sure about Extras) compose tools do 
honor Exclude/ExclusiveArch on noarch packages.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpeTRoMJX8J4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux