On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 14:32 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 14:19 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote: > > > > This depends on whether Red Hat can do reviews of these packages. Many > > of us are under the assumption that since the packages came from Red > > Hat, we ought to let the community review them. > > While you shouldn't review your own package (or perhaps also for > packages that you're a substantial contributor to the packaging), I > don't think there's any problem at all with having another community > contributor who happens to have an @redhat.com address do a review of > the package. +1. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
