Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 14:19 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> This depends on whether Red Hat can do reviews of these packages.
>> Many of us are under the assumption that since the packages came
>> from Red Hat, we ought to let the community review them.
>
> I don't think we need to be that restrictive. I would say as long
> as the maintainer of the package isn't also doing the review, it's
> fine.
>
> There is no need to segregate reviewers based on employer. It just
> needlessly limits the reviewer pool.
Agreed. It would, of course, look bad if there were a ton of
obviously blanket approval reviews. But the many packagers @redhat
are definitely part of the community and their help should be
welcomed.
(Can we send stalled reviews to some folks inside redhat so they can
toss various objects across the cubicles at any co-workers who've been
too busy to reply to merge reviews yet? :)
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The more laws, the less justice.
-- Marcus Tullius Cicero "De Officiis", 44 B.C.
Attachment:
pgpDdhDzILtQw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
