Re: FESCo elections

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 12:04 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Monday 25 June 2007 12:02:53 Karsten Wade wrote:
> > Well, it requires gaming gpg.mit.edu in the process, but I'm sure it
> > could be done.
> 
> Not really.  I have unlimited email addresses at my disposal, and I can 
> generate a new gpg key for each and upload them.  No "gaming" necessary.

Well, that's within my definition of gaming a system  - taking advantage
of a flaw, weakness, or other open part to get an outcome that you want.

Is the first priority in Fedora elections protection of the election
system?

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux