Re: Inconsistent package tags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24 Jun 2007 20:31:22 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
n> 369 (216) packages with fc8 in the release tag (shouldn't we be
n> using f8?)

No, it's fc8.  f8 would sort less than fc7, causing badness.

I know, but its still undesirable to need to put 'fc' in every package
of every release from this point on. Could packages be moved over to
f8 by using release numbers, epochs or some other rpm hack?

n> (27) packages with no fedora version in the release tag

What's wrong with that?


Technically nothing, but my point was that its inconsistent.

n0dalus.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux