On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 04:03:21PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Dave Jones (davej@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Yeah. The alternative is that I un-kill 586, and we continue shipping > > that forever. (Or we just tell those 38 586 users to go make their > > own spin). > > Patch RPM. :P Oh yeah, that's always a good idea ;-)
We could always encode /proc/cpuinfo + compiler flags used into dependencies and... :)
Since my last foray into the rpm source, I have even more respect for pnasrat. I'd drink a lot more if I were in his position.
Hehe, can I quote you on that (I work on RPM these days with Paul) ;) Oh and btw, RPM 4.4.2.1 will support %patch -F<n> too. - Panu - -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
