On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 12:38 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:52:54PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Axel Thimm wrote: > > >On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:07:07PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > >>Hans K. Rosbach wrote: > > >>>Grub depends on fedora-logos that in turn depends on gtk2-engines > > >>>and pretty soon you have pulled in most of the X libraries. > > >>> > > >>>Thats an aweful lot to require for a boot menu, and we didn't > > >>>have this problem for FC4, FC5 and FC6 atleast. Hope this will be > > >>>fixed atleast in rawhide. > > >>> > > >>See the archives of this list. This has been discussed extensively. > > > > > >Pointer or summary? Thanks! > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-June/msg00595.html > > Argh! > > "but since it drops files into application directories, fedora-logos > itself requires many things so that there are no unowned directories > or so that the right application owns it's directories. This is > perhaps one case where we can forgo the policy on directory ownership" > > Drop the policy for fedora-logos or make fedora-logos co-own the > directories. YAFIYGI. fedora-logos 6.0.98-4 no longer Requires on anything, and co-owns the two directories in question. This is entirely likely to break respins and whatnot. I'm trying to test with a rawhide respin, but pungi is, uh, not the fastest. Note, this is rawhide-only atm. Once we figure out what breaks in rawhide we can look at maybe doing this as a 7 update. - ajax -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
