Re: guideline-isms leading to dependency bloats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Held wrote:
Am Freitag, den 15.06.2007, 09:33 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:

Ah, thats a bug then. Can you file it, please ?

Maybe one can also write an Email to Legal and explain what is bad with
that decission and ask if it is good enough if we keep this for the SRPM
but are allowed to split packages?

Which Legal was this if i am allowed to asked kindly, Fedora Legal or
RedHat Legal?

Fedora Legal is Red Hat Legal.

Rahul

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux