On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 11:59 +0200, Hans K. Rosbach wrote: > From: "Rahul Sundaram" <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hans K. Rosbach wrote: > > > I haven't checked what is in the fedora-logos package, but > > > it just seems weird to me that some logos would _require_ > > > an engine.. > > > > Wouldn't it be better to waste a second on looking at the files before > > starting a discussion on this? fedora-logos despite the name is not just > > simple logos but all trademarked images in a single package including > > customized themes which depend on specific theming engines. They are all > > in the same package because a clean separation is desirable form the > > legal perspective (trademark images have certain associated restrictions > > to protect the trademark and the brand) and to ease the process of > > creating derivative distributions. > > I have taken a look at the files list now and it's basically a bunch of > images.. And I still cant believe that images can depend on programs. > It's the other way around, a program should depend on the images. > > The images can clearly exist and be used without pulling in gtk2-engines. > Sure gtk2-engines can use them, but none of them truly require the other > to be present. I'm sorry but I simply see no reason to depend on > gtk2-engines. A look at the spec file would suffice: # for /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve Requires: redhat-artwork # for /usr/share/icons/hicolor Requires: hicolor-icon-theme -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
