Hans de Goede writes: > Andy Green wrote: > > Hans de Goede wrote: > > > >> You don't get my objectino, I'm crossing from Fedora but not too Fedora, > >> therefore what is in Fedora's specfile is completely irrelevant. Extreme > >> example, the sdcc cross-compiler already in Fedora. This crosses from > >> Fedora to 8051 (and other) microcontrollers. It uses its own assembler > >> and is its own C-compiler, binutils and gcc are not used at all (except > >> for building the asm / compiler themselves, duh). Should the sdcc > >> specfile be a pathc on top of gcc's specfile, a patch effectively > >> replacing 100% of it, just because its a c-compiler too? > > > > Should Fedora packages have to deal with it at all "just because its a > > c-compiler too?" I think the scenario of striving to be able to build > > glibc for 8051 on sdcc needs to be triaged into a different discussion. > > > > I'm not talking about building glibc for 8051 (that would be kinda hard as an > average 8051 comes with 256 bytes of ram, and no I didn't forget an K or M there). No, that's the 8052, the de luxe version. The 8051 has 128 bytes of RAM... :-) Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
