Re: To Require yelp or not to require yelp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:24:30PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > This is FUD with a few outright lies sprinkled within.
> He said people are going out of their way to make his life as firefox
> maintainer and liason with upstream harder.

Well, clearly that's not Warren's *intent*.

> Refusing to remove something the maintainer of firefox believes is
> a bad idea that exists *solely as a crutch for proprietary software*

But can't that be said for the entire idea of multilib? :)


> seems to be *exactly* what he was saying about ignoring his technical
> input and making his life as maintainer and liason harder.

Ins seriousness: this is hard to argue with, mostly because Christopher is
right, especially when it comes to respecting his work and area of
expertise. On the other hand, Warren also has a lot of valuable expertise in
making a collection of software that many people actually want to use and
are excited about, and that needs to be respected too.

I guess what I'm saying is: can't we all just get along?


-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux