Re: To Require yelp or not to require yelp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Warren Togami (wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> This is FUD with a few outright lies sprinkled within.

He said people are going out of their way to make his life as firefox
maintainer and liason with upstream harder.

You say:

> - I created firefox-32 as an alternative way to explicitly launch the 
> 32bit firefox on x86_64 because you rejected multiple REASONABLE 
> requests to allow it to be launched somehow without modifying 
> /usr/bin/firefox manually.
> - I added it to Extras because I wanted a convenient shell script to 
> launch the 32bit browser without removing x86_64.
> - You objected to it.  I refused to remove it until nspluginwrapper was 
> viable.

Refusing to remove something the maintainer of firefox believes is
a bad idea that exists *solely as a crutch for proprietary software*
seems to be *exactly* what he was saying about ignoring his technical
input and making his life as maintainer and liason harder.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux