Re: The updates firehose

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 11 June 2007 11:56:21 Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Fortunately, not many things require metacity, and chances are that the
> user isn't going to install it post facto since we install firstboot by
> default which has an explicit metacity requirement.

The way it came to my attention was somebody trying to use pungi to respin 
Fedora.  Depsolving brought in all the -devel stuff.  Perhaps this is also a 
result of how pungi is doing the depsolving as it has to do it differently 
than one would do at install time.  (IE I can't rely on the metacity already 
in the transaction to satisfy a dep of something else as that user may not 
actually select metacity, I need to pull in all possible providers of a dep 
and have anaconda/yum sort it out at install time based on the packages 
selected then).

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpVd8w4yF3gD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux