On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 04:05:00PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > Anybody else think we're issuing entirely /way/ too many updates? We've had > 138 "stable" updates, and 177 current "testing" updates. If all those were > to go stable, we're talking over 300 updates, in just over a week. These numbers are useless, in my opinion. Among those updates how many are problematic? Still nn my opinion those are not problematic: * fix important bug * interesting new features, without important and backward incompatible changes * new package * soname change, but with a compat (including a compat-devel) package * specialzed software with small userbase and a packager knowing what he is doing So, how much left after removing those? -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
