On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 20:16 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 01:43:31PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:33 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 07:58:03PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > - Don't make me increment integers (Release); this is
> > > > > what computers (i.e. the build system) are for
> > > >
> > > > Whatever you suggest to change, be sure that the final spec file
> > > > contains a real integer, not a macro defined in the build system
> > > > or so.
> > > >
> > > > It's already very discussable that %{?dist} is now used in the
> > > > release tags. I know this was introduced to overcome a - what
> > > > you can maybe call - shortcome in RPM, but it has its drawbacks
> > > > and every use of non-standard externally defined macros violates
> > > > the principles of RPM, being able to reproduce package building.
> > >
> > > But the disttag is designed in such a way as to also work when there
> > > is no definition for it.
> >
> > Wouldn't it make sense to add a make newrelease command that greps the
> > existing tag from cvs and retrieves the current release number.
> > Then use sed/awk/perl/whatever to increment it (in a sensible way) and
> > writes it down into the spec, and, while there, also creates a new
> > changelog entry with the current date and person/email information.
>
> FWIW these things are all done in the appropriate emacs mode. Don't now
> if there is a vim mode as well, if not, then maybe we need one.
I don't think emacs modes or vim modes are appropriate here, sure they
will be really handy for people that use either emacs or vim (if they
get to know) but they will not help people that use other editors,
that's why I propose to make it a Makefile option (and visible with make
help).
Simo.
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
