Re: Reply-To header munging for fedora-devel-list@

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Axel Thimm wrote:

On a subscriber-only list I consider that a feature. I hate getting
duplicate emails, especially ones that don't have a List-Id: header to
properly sort the mail (like the Cc'd mail wouldn't have).

You probably get duplicate e-mail also for cross-postings when
you're subscribed to both lists.  But is it a big deal?  You only
read them once anyway.

But how did you notice this reply for you on fedora-list?
The way I do it, is very unreliable and clumsy: grou by
thread, search for my own postings, look if they have any
unread replies.


But some of these lists you mention are not subscriber only.
I also think lists should be open to posting by non-subscribers...
Otherwise cross-posting is painful and doesn't work as intended
(i.e.: you get half of the messages in each list).

But cross-posting is discouraged anyway.

Discouraged by whom?  If I post with a subject such as
"kernel with selinux enabled slows down OpenGL", I'd
cross-post to all relevant lists: fedora-devel@,
linux-kernel@, selinux@, mesa3d-dev@ and dri@.

People subscribed to these lists are likely to be interested.
If they're not, they will just skip the thread after reading
the subject.

Let's not talk about bandwidth issues, please.  I can
comfortably read 10-20 high-traffic lists even with my
slow connection at home.  And web services such as gmame
and gmail make it easy even from hand-helds.




The spam argument is easily dismissed once you notice that
linux-kernel@ is almost 100% spam free despite being open.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/8/146

I stand corrected.  (but see the replies: people /like/ open
lists for the same reasons I gave)


OK, there are a couple of mailing lists on this very server that are
open to anyone just have a look at for example
video4linux-list@xxxxxxxxxx to see the amount of spam.

I can't see the archives without subscribing first.  But what
kind of filtering did RedHat put in front of their listserver?

Maybe I've not ran lists with such high-profile, but I have
two dozens of lists in my mailman and easily got rid of almost
all the incoming spam.  I see one every few days, which is
very affordable.

--
  // Bernardo Innocenti
\X/  http://www.codewiz.org/

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux