Le vendredi 08 juin 2007 à 18:25 -0500, Jeffrey C. Ollie a écrit : > On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 23:48 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > If you actually look at the information you want published (not your > > local developer undo/redo queue), is it so much different from what > > we're already publishing today ? Exploded view may make the changes > > easier to grasp, but do we *actually* need any datapoint apart from each > > package build state published? > > Depending on the changes made between releases I wrote about build state, and hopefully a packages sees several builds in devel between releases if it's heavily modified > I can recall several instances where I've been trying > to update an old patch and it's been a lot easier (in some cases > trivial) to check out a old copy of the upstream code from their SCM > apply the patch and then merge up to the present. That's an argument for exploded view, not for VCS-ing all the packager activity -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
