Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 11:06 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > Absolutely -- they have different reasons for wanting this than we do. Wanting what? If what = kill centralised cvs for modern scm exploded trees, with cvs/svn/whatever gateways, while keeping the current srpm export/import modes, why not If what = get everyone to use _insert_preferred_scm_there and kill other access modes → not good > Our reasons are: > 1) Better able to work with upstream Upstreams do not agree on scm choices (when they use one) > 2) Better able to rebase our local changes. We don't want to get good at local changes, we want to push changes upstream, and even cvs is good enough for our basic rebasing needs today > 3) Better able to see how our changes have been modified over time. See 2. IMHO the killer argument for SCM changes is the unconnected mode new scms offer, but any package that needs something else than CVS because of your 1 2 3 is in deep trouble. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
