Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 13:31 -0500, Rex Dieter a écrit : >> Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> >> >> > Alsa is mostly a case of "someone needs to poke RH Legal to check the >> > alsa firmware dumps can be packaged (and if not go ask the hadrware >> > vendors for permission)" >> >> All Fedora requires is free redistributability. > > In the case of alsa you have a huge firmware archive for hardware from > many vendors, with alsa telling you the whole set is GPL, and with many > text files in the alsa archive tracing vendor permissions. > > So the question is: do you trust the text files as is? Do they cover all > the firmwares in the archive set? Have any of them incompatible terms? My take is to trust upstream, until there surfaces cause/evidence to believe otherwise. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
