Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 13:31 -0500, Rex Dieter a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > Alsa is mostly a case of "someone needs to poke RH Legal to check the > > alsa firmware dumps can be packaged (and if not go ask the hadrware > > vendors for permission)" > > All Fedora requires is free redistributability. In the case of alsa you have a huge firmware archive for hardware from many vendors, with alsa telling you the whole set is GPL, and with many text files in the alsa archive tracing vendor permissions. So the question is: do you trust the text files as is? Do they cover all the firmwares in the archive set? Have any of them incompatible terms? That's questions for a lawyer, not a packager. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
