Re: RFR: GIT Package VCS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > However, the solution they arrive at is similar to what we want.  That's
> > why looking at it is good.
> 
> I think it's important to note that having exploaded trees with patch 
> management doesn't exclude generating a srpm with prestine source +patches to 
> send into the buildsystem and publish in our source repos.  What we're 
> talking about is making it easier to manage the patches on top of the 
> prestine source.

The question is... how much does working in an exploded tree push you towards
less incentive to get a set of patches and changes upstream. 

Heck, we could just work in exploded source and start claiming we *are*
the upstream...

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux