On Thursday 07 June 2007 14:06:10 Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Absolutely -- they have different reasons for wanting this than we do. > > Our reasons are: > 1) Better able to work with upstream > 2) Better able to rebase our local changes. > 3) Better able to see how our changes have been modified over time. > > However, the solution they arrive at is similar to what we want. That's > why looking at it is good. I think it's important to note that having exploaded trees with patch management doesn't exclude generating a srpm with prestine source +patches to send into the buildsystem and publish in our source repos. What we're talking about is making it easier to manage the patches on top of the prestine source. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpd6h7CFfbfu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
