On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 13:54 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Simo Sorce (ssorce@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > to be honest, > > I think deciding the package shape based on the broken way we are > > currently detecting multi-libs is a bad way to decide. > > > > We should fix the way we detect multi-libs, not produce substandard > > packaging to keep the current multi-libs detection process happy. > > It's not a matter of changing the detection (getting the right packages > in the tree a multilib), it's a matter of making upgrades work when > package X is no longer multilib. That's significantly trickier. It's not like we don't already have the problem, though. Adding to the list in anaconda is simple enough and Seth has most of a yum plugin written. Then we just have to move the list from being hard-coded in anaconda to a separate metadata file that ends up in the repos Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
