Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
But yes, most of the terminals descriptions could be moved to a subpackage and add it to comps' core group so it's installed by default. The base package would have only few selected descriptions that are widely used. Would that be ok?
It would be perfect, indeed!
I'm not sure about removing terminfo from default Fedora install, Users can connect via ssh and use many different terminals.
Then let's make the default choice broad enough to include any hardware or software terminals shipped with the last 10 years. I'm sure we could _still_ get rid of 95% of that junk. A safe bet could be taking what Debian is also shipping: Eterm Eterm-color -> Eterm ansi cons25 cygwin umb hurd linux mach mach-bold mach-color pcansi rxvt rxvt-basic rxvt-m -> rxvt-basic rxvt-unicode screen screen-bce screen-s screen-w sun vt100 vt102 vt220 vt52 wsvt25 wsvt25m xterm xterm-color xterm-debian xterm-mono xterm-r5 xterm-r6 xterm-vt220 xterm-xfree86 -- // Bernardo Innocenti \X/ http://www.codewiz.org/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
