Re: fedora for ARM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 16:16 -0600, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> > Supporting cross-compiling would be great, but having spent a several
> > weeks fighting with Python and its libraries last year and losing, I
> > suspect scouring the other nine zillion Fedora packages for
> 
> Packages like Python and Perl do take some work, but a number of 
> individuals have already done that work.  Multiple times.  Multiple 
> approaches.  Fedora becoming cross friendly could have the effect of 
> unifying those efforts, getting cross changes upstream, ending all the 
> waste. 

I like the idea, really. But we're seeing serious resistance to the
suggestion that package maintainers should even have to look at _native_
build failures on architectures which used to build, even though such
failures are _often_ indicative of a generic problem and not an
arch-specific problem.

Do you really think we're going to get them to care about cross builds
too? I _did_ care about cross-compilation, and I gave up on it. I really
don't think we have much chance of getting package maintainers (and
upstreams) to handle it. Unfortunately.

-- 
dwmw2

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux