On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 16:16 -0600, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > Supporting cross-compiling would be great, but having spent a several > > weeks fighting with Python and its libraries last year and losing, I > > suspect scouring the other nine zillion Fedora packages for > > Packages like Python and Perl do take some work, but a number of > individuals have already done that work. Multiple times. Multiple > approaches. Fedora becoming cross friendly could have the effect of > unifying those efforts, getting cross changes upstream, ending all the > waste. I like the idea, really. But we're seeing serious resistance to the suggestion that package maintainers should even have to look at _native_ build failures on architectures which used to build, even though such failures are _often_ indicative of a generic problem and not an arch-specific problem. Do you really think we're going to get them to care about cross builds too? I _did_ care about cross-compilation, and I gave up on it. I really don't think we have much chance of getting package maintainers (and upstreams) to handle it. Unfortunately. -- dwmw2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list